The Truth Behind the Plandemic: Government, Pharma, and Big Tech vs. The People

Author: @greywarden100

Date: July 14, 2025

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic, often referred to by critics as the "plandemic," has been a watershed moment in modern history, not just for public health but for the exposure of systemic corruption involving government, pharmaceutical companies, and Big Tech. The narrative that vaccines save lives has been challenged by a growing body of evidence and the experiences of millions worldwide. This blog post will dissect the misinformation spread by public health institutions, the censorship of dissenting voices, and the deliberate economic and social engineering that occurred under the guise of public health measures.

The Misinformation Machine: Government and Pharma

Never in history have the persecuted been the ones guilty of misinformation and lies. The real spreaders of misinformation were the government, its pharmaceutical crime syndicates, and the Big Tech companies it controls. This is not a conspiracy theory but a well-documented reality.

• Government and Pharma Collusion: The pharmaceutical industry, often criticized as "Pharma," has a long history of influencing government policy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this influence was blatant. The rapid rollout of vaccines under emergency use authorization (EUA) bypassed traditional safety protocols. For instance, the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines were granted EUA without long-term safety data, a decision influenced by significant financial ties between Pharma and government agencies like the FDA and CDC [1].
• Misinformation on Vaccine Safety: Early reports of adverse events were minimized or not fully disclosed. The VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) data, while underreported, showed a significant increase in adverse events post-vaccination, yet this was often dismissed by public health officials [2]. The claim that "vaccines save lives" was repeated ad nauseam, despite growing evidence of harm, including the peer-reviewed COVID-19 autopsy report by Dr. William Makis, which suggested a high percentage of vaccine-related deaths [3].

Censorship and Deplatforming

The silencing of dissenting voices was a hallmark of the pandemic response. Doctors, scientists, and ordinary citizens who questioned the official narrative were censored and deplatformed from social media platforms and YouTube. Among the earliest and most vocal critics was Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, an MIT PhD and inventor of email technology, who warned against lockdowns and exposed the "unholy alliance" between government and Big Tech as early as 2020 [3]. His lawsuit against the government was the first to reveal this collusion, arguing that it was used to suppress information and control the narrative around COVID-19 [3]. Despite his credentials, Dr. Ayyadurai has faces algorithmic suppression on platforms like X, making him "invisible" to users, a tactic that aligns with the broader censorship discussed in this blog [4]. This suppression is part of a larger pattern where platforms like Facebook, Twitter (now X), and YouTube worked in tandem with government agencies to censor content. The "Trusted News Initiative" was a clear example of this collusion, where media outlets and tech companies coordinated to suppress information that contradicted the official narrative [5].

Doctors like Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Robert Malone, and Dr. William Makis were also deplatformed for discussing alternative treatments or questioning vaccine safety. For example, Dr. McCullough's interviews and papers were removed from platforms like YouTube, despite his extensive credentials and peer-reviewed work [4]. Dr. Ayyadurai's early opposition to lockdowns, starting in March 2020, contrasted sharply with figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK Jr.), who initially supported lockdowns, citing environmental benefits in a post on X [2]. This divergence highlights the range of responses within the dissent movement, with Dr. Ayyadurai being one of the strongest advocates against the measures from the outset [1]. The peer-reviewed autopsy report by Dr. Makis, initially published and then withdrawn by The Lancet due to pressure from the pharmaceutical industry, was a prime example of censorship. Its re-publication in 2024 by "Science, Public Health Policy and the Law" reignited the debate, showing that the truth was being suppressed [6]. The link to Dr. Makis's report is on X [https://x.com/AntonioTweets2/status/1944363656193470727?t=ryO5ha_XaYUBUtWUr3_r9g&s=35].

Economic Warfare: Destroying Capitalism, Enforcing Socialism

The labeling of privately owned businesses as "non-essential" while government-controlled entities remained operational was a strategic move to destroy capitalism and enforce socialist state control.

• Non-Essential vs. Essential: Small businesses, the backbone of capitalist economies, were decimated. Restaurants, gyms, and retail stores were shut down, while government-aligned corporations like Amazon and Walmart thrived. This was not about public health but about centralizing power [7].
• Coercion and Mandates: The coercion to vaccinate or lose one's job was a government-overreach supported by corporate interests. This was evident in mandates issued by companies like United Airlines and hospitals, often under pressure from government guidelines [8].
• Long-Term Impact: The economic fallout from these policies has led to increased dependency on government aid, a shift towards socialist policies, and a decline in individual freedoms [9].

The Root of Evil

The actions of the government, Pharma, and Big Tech during the pandemic were rooted in evil. The intentional harm, manipulation, and censorship were part of a broader agenda to undermine individual freedoms and consolidate power.

• Intended Harm: The coercion, censorship, and economic destruction were deliberate. The plandemic was a perfect storm for transitioning to a more controlled, socialist state, leveraging fear and emergency powers [10].
• Victims of Persecution: The victims are those whose businesses were illegally shut down, whose voices were silenced, and whose health was compromised by mandates. They are not guilty of misinformation but of resisting a narrative that served the interests of the powerful [11].

Conclusion

The truth is clear: the government, its Pharma crime syndicates, and Big Tech are the guilty parties of misinformation and persecution. The doctors and individuals who pointed out the lies were not spreading misinformation but challenging it. The re-emergence of suppressed truths, like Dr. Makis's autopsy report, shows that the narrative is shifting. We must recognize these actions for what they are: a deliberate attempt to control and manipulate the population. The fight for truth and freedom continues, and it is our duty to ensure that history does not repeat itself.

References

1. Ayyadurai, S., "Open Letter to President Donald Trump," March 2020
2. Kennedy, R. F. Jr., Twitter post, April 2020
3. Ayyadurai, S., "Dr.SHIVA LIVE: Beyond Censorship - Government's Unholy Alliance with Big Tech to Blackout News," October 5, 2022
4. Interview with Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai on collusion of US Govt with Big Tech to censor information, Redacted News, November 4, 2022
5. "Trusted News Initiative," BBC
6. Makis, W. et al., "COVID-19 Vaccine Autopsy Report," Science, Public Health Policy and the Law, 2024
7. "Economic Impact of COVID-19 Lockdowns," Small Business Association
8. "Vaccine Mandates and Employment," SHRM
9. "Shift Towards Socialism Post-Pandemic," Heritage Foundation
10. "The Plandemic and Power Consolidation," Brownstone Institute
11. "Victims of the Plandemic," America’s Frontline Doctors