My response to a Marxist

Marxist > "Fascism and communism (as defined by the 1848 Communist Manifesto written by Mark and Engels) are polar opposites. Fascism is the unity of the state and corporations represented by a dictatorial figurehead, such as Hitler/Mussolini. All organisations that represent the interests of the working class are destroyed, such as trade unions, political parties, cooperatives etc. Freedoms and civil liberties are restricted and curtailed. Marxist communism envisages an ultimately stateless society where power is collectively held and has a lateral structure. Each region/locality would be responsible for the organisation of life in its domain. There would be no overarching state. Marx wanted the fruits of peoples' labour to be enjoyed by the people rather than stolen from them and sold back to them as commodities. What we are witnessing now with the WEF/WHO golbalists is the impostion of fascism - rule by capitlalist corporations - in order to prepare the ground for a return to fuedalism, a situation where people are enslaved by a tiny group of super-rich oligarchs who own everything while the people will have no rights whatsoever."

My Response below:

@greywarden100 > Fascism by definition is trade unionism. Mussolini nor Hitler destroyed the Trade Unions. What they did was erradicate the Private Trade Unions that refused to be absorbed by the State. The rest of the trade unions came under state control. Hitler did it through the German Labour Front as all trade unions were absorbed by it and if they didn't comply, they were squashed.

And no, Capitalism is not the State. By definition, everything that comes under collective state control is Socialism, as Socialism by definiton is the Public Sector State Control of the means of production. Capitalism is the Private Individual Control of the means of production. Capitalism is Anti-State. Every individual going about their own thing is completely contrary to a collective controlling their lives and economy.

If you didn't know, Totalitarianism cannot happen without Socialism. Totalitarianism is the Public Sector State Control of the Economy. You cannot have Totalitarianism under Capitalism, as every individual fending for themselves abolishes that.

Feudalism is the King in full ownership of the means of production. However, people are not that stupid to let that fly. The King always needed a collective of trusted people to help control the means of production. From Feudalism you get Socialism which is the collective control of the means of production. You do not get Capitalism as Capitalism is for every individual to fend for themselves and own and control their own means of production and by this their own economy. It destroys the whole thing for both a Feudalist and Socialist Government.