RE: Play Hive Bits With Pepe! (9/2)

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Even if a bot can technically run unattended, it should still be regularly monitored (by at least one human) if it is doing something important !INDEED. 🤔🤖😏

!HOPE !WEIRD !MMB !BRN



0
0
0.000
7 comments
avatar

Well, you could have an orchestrator agent keep track of a more specific worker agent pretty easily. 😁🙏💚✨🤙

!ALIVE
!BBH
!MMB
!WEIRD
!ZOMBIE

0
0
0.000
avatar

And then that orchestrator agent will have a higher-level supervisory agent looking after it !INDEED. 🤔🤖🤖🤯🤓

!HOPE !MMB !WEIRD !BRN

0
0
0.000
avatar

The tracking and supervision doesn't necessarily have to be implemented hierarchically. There could be multiple independent agents which track various aspects of the system, including the orchestrator. 😁🙏💚✨🤙

!ALIVE
!BBH
!MMB
!WEIRD
!ZOMBIE

0
0
0.000
avatar

Then that means that what @savvyplayer said about AI agents supervising each other is at least somewhat accurate !INDEED. 🤔🤖🤓

!HOPE !BRN !STRIDE !MMB

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes, there can be systems of mutual monitoring and supervision, though those setups are less common. 😁🙏💚✨🤙

!ALIVE
!BBH
!MMB
!STRIDE
!WEIRD
!ZOMBIE

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

That made me think of decentralized (and "censorship-resistant") AI agents. 🤖🤯🤓

0
0
0.000
avatar

While it sounds interesting, I'm not sure how that could be implemented, and you've got a misapplied verbal tense there. 😁🙏💚✨🤙

!ALIVE
!BBH
!HEARTBEAT
!MMB

0
0
0.000