RE: Play Hive Bits With Pepe! (9/2)

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Yes, of course, unattended services can be left for long periods of time, though their status should still be periodically checked, especially if they're doing something important.

It's right on the edge I'd say. 😁🙏💚✨🤙

!ALIVE
!BBH
!HOPE
!INDEED
!PIZZA
!WEIRD



0
0
0.000
8 comments
avatar

Even if a bot can technically run unattended, it should still be regularly monitored (by at least one human) if it is doing something important !INDEED. 🤔🤖😏

!HOPE !WEIRD !MMB !BRN

0
0
0.000
avatar

Well, you could have an orchestrator agent keep track of a more specific worker agent pretty easily. 😁🙏💚✨🤙

!ALIVE
!BBH
!MMB
!WEIRD
!ZOMBIE

0
0
0.000
avatar

And then that orchestrator agent will have a higher-level supervisory agent looking after it !INDEED. 🤔🤖🤖🤯🤓

!HOPE !MMB !WEIRD !BRN

0
0
0.000
avatar

The tracking and supervision doesn't necessarily have to be implemented hierarchically. There could be multiple independent agents which track various aspects of the system, including the orchestrator. 😁🙏💚✨🤙

!ALIVE
!BBH
!MMB
!WEIRD
!ZOMBIE

0
0
0.000
avatar

Then that means that what @savvyplayer said about AI agents supervising each other is at least somewhat accurate !INDEED. 🤔🤖🤓

!HOPE !BRN !STRIDE !MMB

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes, there can be systems of mutual monitoring and supervision, though those setups are less common. 😁🙏💚✨🤙

!ALIVE
!BBH
!MMB
!STRIDE
!WEIRD
!ZOMBIE

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

That made me think of decentralized (and "censorship-resistant") AI agents. 🤖🤯🤓

0
0
0.000
avatar

While it sounds interesting, I'm not sure how that could be implemented, and you've got a misapplied verbal tense there. 😁🙏💚✨🤙

!ALIVE
!BBH
!HEARTBEAT
!MMB

0
0
0.000