Meaning of Gleichshatung

Greywarden > There is another very important thing i forgot to mention about what is incorrectly translated from the German as (Privatizations).. This type of study reminds me a lot about the days when i was studying the Scriptures and the Biblical Hebrew language in comparison to the translations. The only difference is that Politics is so much easier to understand than all the Bible. Maybe because the people who wrote the scriptures lived thousands of years ago which makes it much more difficult to understand them.



But, back to explaining the suppose Privatizations of the Nazis. The German word is (Gleichshatung) which actually means to stand in line (synchronization). It does not mean (Privatizations) as many historians claim.



The Nazis did not Privatize the Industries and did not crush the Trade Unions. They absorbed the Trade Unions into the DAF (German Labour Front), which was a Giant Bloated Gorilla of a Trade Union. The Private Trade Unions were indeed crushed, as Hitler needed complete control of the economy to establish a Totalitarian Government.



The banks weren't Privatized nor anything else. Here is a primary source proving the Banks were not privatized by Gunther Reimann below.



"The Dresdner bank, for instance, sold the bulk of its own stock, 120 million marks, which has been owned by the State, to the Public."



Gunther Reimann: "This was easily arranged through the Bank's 165 branches. The clients obviously prefered the stock of a private corporation to State bonds."



Gunther Reimann: "The result of this transaction was that the Government obtained funds of private investors and yet did not lose control over the privately owned Dresdner Bank."



Gunther Reimann: "For the State has organized and rigorously maintains supervision of all security issues and in general of the credit policies of the banks." The Vampire Economy Page 181...



Greywarden > Bear in mind that Gunther Reimann was a Marxist and did not know how to differentiate Public from Private. Yet he is a primary source that proves contrary to most Historians, that the State never lost control of the Banks, proving that Privatizations did not exist. And as we know, State Control of the means of Production is Socialism not Capitalism.
Jose The Great @Iblegend There is another very important thing i forgot to mention about