The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly on the Supreme Court Vaccine Mandate Opinion
GOOD: Supreme Court holds vaccine mandate for businesses is illegal. (We absolutely gotta take a win when we get it!)
“Although Congress has indisputably given OSHA the power to regulate occupational dangers, it has not given that agency the power to regulate public health more broadly. Requiring the vaccination of 84 million Americans, selected simply because they work for employers with more than 100 employees, certainly falls in the latter category,” the unsigned opinion says.
BAD: The opinion absolutely leaves room for another mandate, tailored differently.
UGLY: The Court believes the feds had the power to pass the OSH Act in the first place – and get deeply involved in healthcare today.
It’s important to understand that the Supreme Court opinion today is largely based on the argument that Congress didn’t expressly authorize a vaccine mandate in the OSH Act of 1970.
So, if Congress does just that, we can count on SCOTUS to back up their power as they usually do.
But, under the Constitution, the OSH Act of 1970 was unconstitutional from day one.
Whether Congress gets around to expanding their own power this year, or in 50 years, we shouldn’t be surprised about it – unless the people reject the foundation of it all.
That includes – no longer waiting for the federal government to limit its own power.
It’s up to the people to preserve their own Constitution.
Source: Tenth Amendment Center
Michael Boldin [send him email] is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center. He was raised in Milwaukee, WI, and currently resides in Los Angeles, CA. Follow him on twitter - @michaelboldin and Facebook.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.
Here's the act that much of this tyranny is based on, enacted a few months after 9/11.
https://www.aapsonline.org/legis/msehpa2.pdf
Much appreciated!
Be sure to check out article VI
This is exactly it. SCOTUS told Congress that if they want to do something, they need to pass a law for it that sits within the framework of the Constitution.
Personally, I think laws and regulations such as this need to be left to the individual States where it can be more effectively managed. Or not. Leave it to the States to govern themselves.
Absolutely! Thank you very much for reading and commenting.
Hello everyone and thank you for the energy you put into sharing the truth activistpost. I've been following alternative news and history for 10 years now and boy, they have been the most accurate so far.
We find ourselves in a big period of change, and i believe humanity won't be recognizable in a decade. But I agree strongly on the fact that we need more people to act, more real grassroots movements. And avoiding the same mistakes is not easy, people's movements fall prey to corrupted leaders or morally weak leadership easily and constantly. I also believe without the influx of spirit few things can be achieved.
That's why we are working on developing a Community Governance Dapp. Please feel free to check it out.
Whitepaper:
@atma.love/matrix-8-white-paper-abstract?ref=atma.love
Q&A
@atma.love/matrix-8-questions-and-answers?ref=atma.love
Cheers!
Thank you so much!!
Thank you!